Since 1984, the winner of the Alabama – LSU game has gone right along with election results. An Alabama victory was followed by a win by the democratic nominee, while a win by LSU signaled the Republican candidate being voted into office. It has been accurate for the past seven elections.

Let’s take a look:

1984: LSU 16, Alabama 14. Ronald Reagan (R)
1988: LSU 19, Alabama 18. George H.W. Bush (R)
1992: Alabama 31, LSU 11. Bill Clinton (D)
1996: Alabama 26, LSU 0. Bill Clinton (D)
2000: LSU 30, Alabama 28. George W. Bush (R)
2004: LSU 26, Alabama 10. George W. Bush (R)
2008: Alabama 27, LSU 21. Barack Obama (D)

If this trend continues, an Alabama win signals a victory for the Democratic party and an Obama re-election. If LSU had won it would have signaled a victory for the Republican party and a Romney election.

With that bit of knowledge, who did you root for?

Thanks for sharing that info. Had never heard that. If it holds true this year there will be some very unhappy MVB. AS for me, I don't think there's a dime's worth of difference between the two of them.

I pull for Alabama until they play Auburn.

May I ask if you had folk at BBC in early to mid fifties?

Ivy's correct - There isn't a 'dime's' worth of difference - The difference will be much more costly than that - it will be the burden of debt our children, our grandchildren and their children will suffer if the Bama/LSU things holds true -

GO BAMA

When Alpine beats Kymulga in Ice Hockey..you can count on a COLD winter. Check the record book!

The last time Alpine played Kymulga in Ice Hockey it was a 3-3 Tie. When they went into overtime the Ice Melted and they had to call the game. Two of Alpine's players nearly drowned

Oh, HOCKEY!