BIBLE AND THEOLOGY FORUM






Correct Addy: http://bible-forum.invisionzone.com/

is the new site, but if you click on that link, it may not go there. But if you put that addy http://Bible-Forum.InvisionZone.com in your URL box, it will go there.  The Invisionzone forum has many categories of Bible & Theology with special forums for each.  This Bravenet site here is the old general forum site.  We may eliminate that invision site because it is expensive and is not getting enough traffic.

Welcome!  You are at BibleAndTheology.com, which is the general forum for BibleAndTheology.org.  Persons are invited to post on Bible and Theology (widely interpreted).  Some postings may be chosen to be reposted on BibleAndTheology.org.  Give & receive love here. If you post here, please do not use "Anonymous" or the like. Choose your own screen names, but do not use one that you know is already being used by someone else. Please: 

1. You may debate with any ideas posted, but do not post objections to the topic, style, spelling, use of capital letters, or grammar of anyone's posting.  For example, you may debate whether the moon is made of green cheese, but kindly refrain from reviling a poster by telling him that it is politically incorrect to discuss green cheese.   

2. Do not post complaints or attacks vs. other posters.  

3. No obscene language,cuss words, or blasphemy may be used.   

4. Send complaints privately by e-mail to NellPatKay@hotmail.com.  If your posting is deleted, it could be because it violates forum rules or is just chosen for a short run on the forum.  

  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . If you want the password, register your screen names by e-mail, as password may be needed again if problems arise on the Forum. CHECK OUT THE search function, which is good: it checks the content of the postings.


Note that if you paste onto the Forum, for some reason Bravenet may change your quote marks and apostrophes into something else, like little boxes or funny U's.   Thanks for coming, participating, and for showing love . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Also try out our new site:

http://bible-forum.invisionzone.com/

BIBLE AND THEOLOGY FORUM
Start a New Topic 
Author
Comment
Miss California, The Sodomist Agenda, & the Media Circus

1. Has anyone actually read what Miss CA said? She began by endorsing choice. Then she confided her opinion. The answer was tolerant and manifested not a smidgen of phobia of anything.

2. What is outrageous is that a judge should put a politically controversial question to a contestant and then judge against the contestant for lacking fear/phobia and speaking her mind.

3. If most of the anti-Miss CA people gladly and happily look at pornography, why are they attacking Miss Ca for posing for semi-nude pictures? This looks cynical. Is it not the case that Miss CA is attacked because she did not fear (phobia) the Sodomist judges enough to be coerced into helping their agenda?

4. And it is also dishonest for demanding that a person who opposes the redefinition of marriage should also be a thorough-going Biblicist. It is also dishonest to accuse Miss Ca of being "holier-than-thou," since there was no such statement ever made by Miss CA.

5. It is also quite ignorant to think that everyone who calls herself a Christian is a Biblicist. The world is full of idiots who call themselves Christians and don't believe the Bible.

6. Miss CA's comments (modestly and tolerantly expressed) are probably more liberal on this subject than that of the majority of Americans. It was not long ago that Sodomy was considered a vile, abominable sin and a crime to be punished. Persons with common sense knew that a penis does not belong in an anus.

7. It is a dishonest attempt to denigrate opponents of the redefinition of marriage by calling them "homophobes," just as it is dishonest and slanderous to call opponents of Sodomy "homophobes." For phobias are mental illnesses. And the DSM-IV has not amental illness called "homophobia" the last time I read it.

8. Participating in such a beauty contest and posing for photos of indecent exposure are sins for being lust-provocative.

9. I have seen no evidence that Miss CA is a Christian or a Biblicist, aside from her use of the term "Christian" for herself, which really means very little. I called my self a Christian for many years before I actually trusted the Lord Jesus as my savior.

10. All genuine Christians live inconsistent lives, because they never lose their sin natures until death. In many things we all stumble, as James says. 1 John says that if we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves. Christians are saved by grace, unmerited favor based upon Christ's payment for their sins on the cross. To get ones knickers in a knot because a Christian is found to have sinned is stupid. Christ never promised a Christian a sinless life, only the constant provision of a power that makes it possible not to sin. Thus Miss CA could be a Christian, who like all of us sins quite a bit.

11. The true homophobes are those who fear the homos and knuckle under to their intimidation.

12. Miss CA may end up weeping all the way to the bank over all this publicity. So keep up the criticism and make her rich.