Return to Website

Number Watch Web Forum

This forum is about wrong numbers in science, politics and the media. It respects good science and good English.

Number Watch Web Forum
Start a New Topic 
Good Epidemiology

I may have asked this before, but I can't find it in the thread without lots of extra effort.

Is there a list of epidemiological results that have been fruitful.

1. Smoking linked to lung cancer. RR 23-46
2. Oral Sex linked to Oral Cancers (thru HPV) RR 9
3. Black Bisexuals linked to HIV/Aids RR > 100
4. Linking the Pump handle to Dysentery (removing the pump handle caused Dys to disappear).

What are the other discoveries with RR > 3 or efforts that led to real life savings. I am not perfectly sure about 1 or 2 having saved lives.

Re: Good Epidemiology

Good question, Brad, to which I don't know the answer, but I think you'll find Dr. Snow's removal of the pump handle stopped a cholera epidemic, rather than dysentery (though I suspect the results of both diseases are similar to the sufferer.
In the UK nowadays, of course, he would have been arrested (so they could harvest his DNA for the database) and charged with criminal damage.

Re: Good Epidemiology

I wish what you said about arrest wasn't true. I can see that happening here in the States. In a variation of wackiness. It is now illegal to warn oncoming drivers of speed traps. If you flash your lights and a police officer observes you, you are subject to a $400 fine. This is the same fine you can receive for honking your horn for other than safety reasons. If you honk your horn to wave at a friend, $400...

We now have Flash Traps here in the state of Washington. One officer sits at one intersection checking for speeders. Another officer sits on the next bridge and watches for people flashing their lights.

I made up the term Flash Traps. Maybe we can start a Meme... Someone else has probably already come up with it.

Re: Good Epidemiology

Surely anyone flashing their lights and "observed" would use the simple defence that they were flashing for one of its two legally sanctioned purposes - to indicate "I am here and perchance you appear not to have noticed", or "I intend to overtake".

The "observer" would then have to testify that there was no possibility that the intended recipient of the signal had failed to notice either the presence of the flashing vehicle (representing a potential danger or obstruction) or was signalling an intention to overtake a slower vehicle. And as we all know, coppers never lie under oath.

Re: Good Epidemiology

And as we all know, coppers never lie under oath.

Many years ago when I had a passing interest in UFOs, there were some stories of police seeing these objects. When two police officers are in agreement and testify in a court of law, the odds are you’ll get a conviction every time. However, when they testify about seeing flying saucers, those odds drop to zero.