Return to Website

Number Watch Web Forum

This forum is about wrong numbers in science, politics and the media. It respects good science and good English.

Forum: Number Watch Web Forum
Start a New Topic 
   Board|Threaded
Author
Comment
View Entire Thread
Re: Air into water

If the development is based on the cost of providing water to troops then dependence on fossil fuels is one to avoid if possible because it places further demands on the supply chain.
But solar or wind powered means they just have to deliver the plant where its needed and turn it on. I suspect they do not intend that it should sign up for a green energy contract with their local electricity supplier.

The US military usually a golden triangle requirement of good, fast and cheap, and will be happy to hit two out of three given no other choices.

Re: Air into water - by Dave Gardner - Nov 14, 2016 4:16pm
Re: Air into water - by brad tittle - Nov 14, 2016 5:45pm
Re: Air into water - by brad tittle - Nov 14, 2016 5:45pm