BIBLE AND THEOLOGY FORUM





Welcome!  You are at BibleAndTheology.com, which is the general forum for BibleAndTheology.org.  Persons are invited to post on Bible and Theology (widely interpreted).  Some postings may be chosen to be reposted on BibleAndTheology.org.  Give & receive love here. If you post here, please do not use "Anonymous" or the like. Choose your own screen names, but do not use one that you know is already being used by someone else. Please: 

1. You may debate with any ideas posted, but do not post objections to the topic, style, spelling, use of capital letters, or grammar of anyone's posting.  For example, you may debate whether the moon is made of green cheese, but kindly refrain from reviling a poster by telling him that it is politically incorrect to discuss green cheese.   

2. Do not post complaints or attacks vs. other posters.  

3. No obscene language,cuss words, or blasphemy may be used.   

4. Send complaints privately by e-mail to NellPatKay@hotmail.com.  If your posting is deleted, it could be because it violates forum rules or is just chosen for a short run on the forum.  

  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . If you want the password, register your screen names by e-mail, as password may be needed again if problems arise on the Forum. CHECK OUT THE search function, which is good: it checks the content of the postings.


Note that if you paste onto the Forum, for some reason Bravenet may change your quote marks and apostrophes into something else, like little boxes or funny U's.   Thanks for coming, participating, and for showing love .


BIBLE AND THEOLOGY FORUM
Start a New Topic 
Author
Comment
PROVE THAT THE PAPACY IS THE SOURCE OF GOD'S WORD

The approach of the RCC apologists seems to be that the Bible is to be considered God's Word only because the RCC says so. By taking that
approach, the RCC is made superior to God's Word. It may not be argued

1) that the RCC is God's Word because the Bible says so & then

2) that the Bible is God's Word because the RCC says so.

That is circular reasoning. Point 1) is not stated in the Bible as there is no RCC & no papacy in the Bible at all.

Thus it appears that the RCC apologists need some proof that the RCC is God's Word or is the source of God's Word. However, the history of the RCC including the widespread pederasty & rape of children discredits as an institution. There is no reason to accept that the papacy is the source of God's Word. In fact, a rational person would conclude after immersing self in the Bible, that the RCC is a system foreign to the Church in the Bible and foreign to the Bible itself. The way the RCC treats saints & Mary is foreign to scripture and idolatry. There is no bowing before images endorsed in the Bible. Celebacy is not advocated for elders/bishops in the Bible. Quite to the contrary, the presbyteros is to be the husband of one wife and have children who are faithful. Peter had a wife. 1 Cor 7 commands that each man should have his own wife. Celebacy is a special gift and has nothing to do with being a presbyteros. Paul is never called a presbyteros. Peter is.

Thou shalt have no other gods before thee.
Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image.

Let us see the proof, O apologist, proof that the RCC is the source of God's Word. You may not use the Bible, if you have said that the Bible is only true because the RCC says so. (It wouldn't do you any good anyway to try to use the Bible).